Nationalist Muslims of India

Didn’t Nehru say there are nationalist Muslims in India and they should be allowed to stay back in the country? To this, Sardar Patel quipped, “There is only one nationalist Muslim in India, and his name is Jawaharlal Nehru.” Well, I have finally found nationalist Muslims in India. Here is a an election poster seen in Kerala recently — surely a work of nationalist Muslims. Can someone from Kerala pls translate this poster for us?

Pakistani posters in Kerala

Pakistani posters in Kerala

Advertisements

37 Comments

Filed under Islam, Jihad, Pakistan

37 responses to “Nationalist Muslims of India

  1. Anish Manikandan

    The line on the top says “Let the green flag fly all around the world”.

    The main body in the middle says “Indian Union Muslim League congratulates Pakistan Muslim League and Nawaz Sharif on coming back to power”.

    The words in black background on the side says “We’re not a district-party but a national-party”.

  2. Just my two cents.
    1. The poster is in bad taste and people involved owe an explanation.
    2. Sardar Patel expressed his difference of opinion (in few cases) with Nehru in person as well as in his letters to Nehru and others. However, never repeat never did he behave like an illiterate bum to use disrespectful tone or language towards Nehru. Sardar was much more of a man to do so. Hence I would like to know the material source of the comment. Let me also say this, before some smart alec jump in with his rhetorical question, that there is a material difference between a ‘direct quote’ and an ‘inference from an incident/folklore’.

    • Jaipal

      @Cynical,

      If anybody was an illiterate bum, it was NEHRU, not Patel.
      Patel was a far greater statesman than Nehru.

      The real hero in India at that time was Patel.
      Nehru is overhyped and a loser.

      • @Jaipal
        ‘If anybody was an illiterate bum, it was NEHRU, not Patel.’
        Where did I say that Patel was an illiterate bum? In future make it a point to read a post twice (at least) before you put your fingers on the keyboard. An irresistible itching on your fingers is no excuse for dumb replies.

        • karan

          Yes,Sardar Patel had not graduated form
          any Foreign University.

          • @karan
            It shows how much the pseudo lovers of Sardar Patel know about him. Patel is just a stick for you to beat Nehru, nothing more. If you really knew about Sardar Patel’s greatness, you would think twice before trying to steal him from congress stable.

          • @karan
            At the age of 36 Sardar went to England to study law. He got admitted in Middle Temple Inn (one of the 3 best law college in England in those days) and finished his 3 years course in 2 and half years and stood 1st in his batch. Sardar was no less British educated than any of his contemporaries. He used to conduct his legal business fully attired in British style clothes. Send his children to British school in Bombay while he himself stayed back and worked from Gujarat. Patel worked closely with Lord Mountbaten and his wife during independence movement and were highly praised by both for his contributions in those turbulent days of freedom struggle.
            It shows how much the pseudo lovers of Sardar Patel know about him. Patel is just a stick for you to beat Nehru, nothing more. If you really knew about Sardar Patel’s greatness, you would think twice before trying to steal him from congress stable. Having liliputians all around in past and present you guys really need a giant, hense this sudden love for the Sardar.

  3. cnm

    @cynical
    “Hence I would like to know the material source of the comment.”
    Oh really!!!!How many times have you supplied material source for your implausible and unreasonable statements?

    You are right Patel was too gentle a man to use disrespectful tone or language towards Nehru. But why should we behave like Patel?
    Especially , when we are witnessing and experiencing the devastation, destruction and misfortune that have visited the us Hindus as a result of Nehru’s anti-Hindu policies. Only a few days before the Paki soldiers have brutally murdered 5 Indian soldiers. The Chinese intrusions into Indian territories have become routine. And the conspiracies by the league of Missionary-mullah- Marxists are rampant against the Hindus and India to fragment India into the smallest possible pieces. Who is responsible for that? Of course Nehru, the traitor. And we are not as gentle a man as Patel not to use disrespectful tone or language towards Nehru. Frankly speaking there is no abusive and derogatory language or terms which can perfectly fit to Nehru’s anti-Hindu character. Anyway we have to do with them.

    • @cnm
      “Oh really!!!!How many times have you supplied material source for your implausible and unreasonable statements?”
      I knew it instinctively that at some stage you would jump in with that rhetoric. That’s why I wrote;
      Let me also say this, before some smart alec jump in with his rhetorical question, that there is a material difference between a ‘direct quote’ and an ‘inference from an incident/folklore’.
      I repeat, try to differentiate between a ‘quote’ and an ‘inference’. But any way when did a zealot cared for finer nuances of language or of cultured, civilized debate? Who needs finesse, when usual stock-in-trade is prejudice and abuse?
      “we are witnessing and experiencing the devastation, destruction and misfortune that have visited the us Hindus as a result of Nehru’s anti-Hindu policies.”
      I see. So Hindus have not suffered devastation, destruction and misfortune before. It happened long before my brother. Exactly 1,177 years before Nehru was even born. When Bin Qasim landed on Sindh, when Ghaznavi ransacked Somenath (seventeen times), when Khiljis reined, when Taimur raided, then by Lodhis, Babur, Aurangzeb (when he beheaded Teg Bahadur and imposed Jijiya), when Nadir Shah slaughtered in thousands……the list is too long. During all that period Hindus were pure of their religion, wise with their shashtras, strong with their ‘Brahmastra’ and assorted ‘Chakras’ like ‘Sudarshan’ etc. and many different ‘Bans’ like Agniban, Varunban etc. And of course then there was the Pushpak rath. They were not polluted then by Gandhi-Nehru secularism. What about that?
      I am sure you would come up with some arcane argument to make defeat look like victory. The truth is we were and still are a nation of loosers, who has made a religion out of perpetual state of sulking and moaning. And the resultant frustration and IMPOTENT anger finds expression in your abusive language and imbecile ranting. Only a looser can feel ridiculed when he is made to look at the mirror.
      Blame the mirror if you like, not me.
      P.S. Those who try to pit Patel against Nehru and try to project Patel as a mere Hindutwavadi instead of a true Indian nationalist should remember, it was Patel who banned RSS immediately after assassination of Gandhi.

      • karan

        Apart from that they appreciated Sardar Ballav Bhai Patel four unification of India from Princely Sates ,specially Hydrabad,Junagarh,Bhopal but not Kashmir due to some interference by Nehru after taking this matter to United Nation.

      • Anonymous

        Cynical – It might surprise to know that the questions asked of you were not rhetorical at all.

      • cnm

        @cynical “I repeat, try to differentiate between a ‘quote’ and an ‘inference’. But any way when did a zealot cared for finer nuances of language or of cultured, civilized debate? Who needs finesse, when usual stock-in-trade is prejudice and abuse?”

        To my repeated questions of providing proof beef eating in the Vedas your reply was given below. Was it your inference which you have based on some Marxist Nonsense or a quote? There are so many such instances.Why this vain arrogance?

        cnm
        July 25, 2013 at 9:58 am
        @cynical
        You go by the contents of a book. How many times you have gone by the contents of the Vedas?

        Reply
        Cynical
        July 26, 2013 at 7:27 am
        Why do I have to read it when I get the same information from scholars who have read it? By the way didi you read ‘Das Capital’ before critisising Marx?
        “So Hindus have not suffered devastation, destruction and misfortune before. It happened long before my brother. Exactly 1,177 years before Nehru was even born.”

        We have discussed about the Islamic Invasion of India elsewhere. It is nobody’s case India was not ravageded by the Islamic Invaders. But it is a historical fact that Hindus had well nigh defeated the Islamic invaders by the time the Britishers invaded India.
        “During all that period Hindus were pure of their religion, wise with their shashtras, strong with their ‘Brahmastra’ and assorted ‘Chakras’ like ‘Sudarshan’ etc. and many different ‘Bans’ like Agniban, Varunban etc. And of course then there was the Pushpak rath. They were not polluted then by Gandhi-Nehru secularism. What about that?”

        Now you have complained that I am using abusive language. Tell me what right you have to deride or ridicule our religion and Devas and Devis. You are an atheist. Ok no problem. You are not the first and never will be the last atheist. That does not give you license to heap contempt on others who do not go by your religion of atheism. This sort of criminal attitude has been the stock-in-trade of Monotheists like you. So long as you will go on belittling Hinduism and Hindus you will be treated with the vilest possible language.
        We are discussing History. It should remain confined to History only. I am convinced on the basis of History that I have read that Islamic invasion was defeated by the Hindu warriors. If you want to contradict that then come with information that refutes my view. Why this slander mongering. That is why I call you a bastard and you are really a bastard.

        “I am sure you would come up with some arcane argument to make defeat look like victory. The truth is we were and still are a nation of loosers, who has made a religion out of perpetual state of sulking and moaning. And the resultant frustration and IMPOTENT anger finds expression in your abusive language and imbecile ranting. Only a looser can feel ridiculed when he is made to look at the mirror.”

        In your inability to understand our sane argument you call them arcane. For anti-nationals like we are country of loosers not for us who know and understand History better that you .

        • Anonymous

          Well said CNM, I notice that the self-proclaimed atheist does not criticise the desert cults of christianity and islam, but can find innumerable faults with Hinduism, also he turns a blind eye to the history of communist nations.

          • kcsharma2012

            Nehruvian secularism & atheism are also bigoted religions practiced in India like the two desert religions.If we reflect a little further these actually political ideologies with a sole aim of damaging & destroying Hinduism.

        • Atul Marathe

          To Cnm, you probably don’t know me, but I was attacking clowns like Cynical and others since 2 years. I have taken ‘voluntary retirement’ and am keeping my part of the pact with Vicjags, who served as the president of all these clowns who keep on appearing in this blog site. Vicjags has honored his word, I don’t think he’s written much. I have read through your writings, they are impressive and you have answered every single stupid comment that Cynical is making. Keep up the good work – Atul

          • cnm

            @Atul Marathe
            Thank you.

          • Thank you sir for taking the ‘voluntary retirement’. You would have done well if you stayed retired. This place is already full of people flexing their intellectual (!) muscles (for not having muscles where it matter to protect their life and limbs and their women) to have a feeling of (virtual) superiority over perceived enemies who in some distant past have really screwed them hard. They are in practice mode.
            Let them become strong, then you can join them as their leader.

  4. kcsharma2012

    Cynical
    Nehru himself admitted that he was Muslim in his thinking (may be birth also he was a Muslim), and everyone knows that he was a nationalist, no one questions that. So he was a nationalist Muslim.Where is the confusion?

    • @kcsharma
      I have also heard of one K C Sharma who himself admitted that he is Muslim in his thinking (may be birth also he is a Muslim)……..
      Where is the confusion??????

      • kcsharma2012

        Not heard, I have read this in a magazine article, not long ago. If I can get hold of the reference I’ll surely furnish it.Meanwhile pls take my friendly advice & keep shut.But giving stupid comments you expose yourself, similar to what Rahul G does every time he opens his mouth.

      • cnm

        @cynical
        I am not sure if Nehru was a Muslim or not. But one thing is clear like day light that Nehru was not a Hindu. By his own admission he is Muslim though. ‘By education I am an Englishman, by views an internationalist, by culture a Muslim, and I am a Hindu only by accident of birth’ – See more at: http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Articles&ArticleID=7030#sthash.vICfHhF8.dpuf

        • kcsharma2012

          @cnm
          Thank you for providing the reference. I am sure there may be other references where which will prove the proposition that Nehru was a Muslim at heart.

        • @cnm
          I have read the link. So I get it now that sundry blog articles written by sundry Jims and Jacks are now the abode of learning. Where have those libraries and their books gone? Any writer worth his salt, when using a direct quote would give a reference to it’s origin, like;
          —-Page no, The title of the book, name of the author, some even mention the publisher.
          Or, if it is quted out of a speech, then;
          The date, the venue, the occasion etc. of where the speech was delivered.
          Any ways, I have with me Nehru’s seminal works, namely, Discovery of India, Glimpses of World History and Letters from a father to his daughter. I can’t remember seeing such a line in any of them.

          • cnm

            @cynical

            It is good to see that you have started reading the links provided by us. Amway, I am sorry. I should have provided that link after verifying the same. I hereby withdraw my comment. Now when are you going to withdraw your comments esp the beef in the Vedas one? Let me remind you that you did not produce any verses from the Vedas to support your views. Or do you want to say that there is no need to produce any proof when they are uttered by Marxists Jims and Jacks. by the way , they are so many questions put by us Hindus waiting for your responses. Are they coming or not? Now, do read this linkhttp://www.deeshaa.org/2013/07/21/nehru-in-his-own-words/
            This link will assure you that the quote by Nehru was from Wikiquote.

            One more request–

            From the numerous links provided by us do point out which of them are unverified ?
            “Any ways, I have with me Nehru’s seminal works, namely, Discovery of India, Glimpses of World History and Letters from a father to his daughter. I can’t remember seeing such a line in any of them.”

            Let me quote a few lines from Dr. Prodosho Aich’s Lies With Long Legs”
            “Nehru’s “DIscovery Of India” is book of almost 600 pages. In small letters and narrowly printed. It has an index of 12 pages, but no bibliography. There is no slightest indication that Jawaharlal Nehru had reviewed even a single one of his sources.”

            Now my question is how is it that such a “seminal” work of your Nehru has no bibliography. How could he write such a book ? By pure intuition? Or did he copy verbatim the books written by frauds like Jones and Maxmullers?

            This my comment will be followed by many more comments dealing with Nehru and his Seminal works if you cooperate.

        • som

          @cnm Accident by birth ???
          According to Nehru ,all Hindus of this nation are like disposable condoms!!!
          Perhaps, this was not the statement of Sardar Ballav
          Bhai Patel and the honorable president Dr Rajendra
          Prasad ,both were made arrangements for renovations of Somnath temple

        • som

          In 1966,Abbas Chatterjee stood first in Indian Administration Service (IAS) and later resigned in1992,devoted his life for welfare of tribals of India.

  5. karan

    Why they do not call it Muslim league International for World Khaliphet.

  6. karan

    A true International spirit,beyond the boundry of nation,but anti-national for Indian specially for Hindus.
    ,

  7. Vineet

    CNM – well said

    In Discovery of India, Nehru mentions Ghazni admiring beauty of Mathura temples like a true secular but conveniently omits the destruction by the same “sickular”

    Further, you will never find an original thought in “Nehru Wisdom.” He was one of the fools who believed in the nonsense of Christianity preceding Hinduism in India and all crap about so called St Thomas.

  8. The writing on the poster is still malaylam……. for the time being.

  9. karan

    To identity some political ideologies as a religious doctrines, is tbe only mistake they never comitted ,which is the greatest sin in their point of view.

  10. “and these people regularly say- even after partition ‘we’ choose to live in India.
    bada ehsaan kiya.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s