The murky world of Congress party

Since “Mahatama” Gandhi took over Congress, the party has always adopted a dog-in-the-manger attitude to power. Political competitors are shunned with extreme prejudice or even eliminated. This flows from the warped personalities of Gandhi and Nehru, both power-hungry freaks who wished all competitors to be dead or banished. They chased away Subhash Bose, did not allow Sardar Patel to become the PM and Nehru was careful never to groom any successor to become the PM after him. Indira Gandhi’s insecurity was legendary.

Things are now reaching their logical conclusion — Congress will set fire to the whole country if you don’t allow it perpetual power to rule. “If we don’t rule India, neither will you as we will burn everything down to ashes” — this is the current attitude of the gang of sycophants, courtiers and hangers-on that currently infest this abdominal institution that hangs like a brick around the neck of India. A curse on every Hindu who votes for it.

The Murky World of Indian Politics

Finally, the Congress is using India’s key institutions to launch political vendettas. Anyone who does not fall in line with the dominant socialist and secular ideology of the Nehru family is accused of being communal. Not only is mainstream media unleashed to create a maelstrom against its enemies, the Congress is now using the full might of the state to destroy those it perceives as threats.

The Congress has been in power at the national level for an overwhelming majority of the period since independence. It is now a dynastic oligarchy where the spoils of power are shared between a few families led by the Nehru family. Modi is a an upstart with no lineage who threatens to upset the Congress applecart. The Congress is using the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to pin the blame of Ishrat Jahan’s killing on Modi and scuttle his political chances at the national level. In the process, the CBI is also turning its guns on Intelligence Bureau (IB), India’s leading intelligence agency. The goal is to paint Ishrat as a martyr and Modi as a murderer. India’s Supreme Court has called the CBI “a caged parrot,” but a more accurate description of the CBI might be an “attack dog” for its political masters. In the past, the CBI has been used against allies and enemies to rein them in or destroy them. But the venom with which the CBI is being directed against Modi sets a new low even for the murky world of Indian politics.

Asif Ibrahim, the IB Director, is Muslim and highly regarded for his integrity. He has told the prime minister that IB has sufficient evidence to prove that Ishrat was a member of LeT with links to Pakistan’s infamous Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The ISI is most famous for training and then supporting the Taliban. It turns out that David Coleman Headley, an operative for LeT and now in US custody, confirmed that Ishrat was a member of LeT. The fact that she was with Pakistani men with known terrorist antecedents gives credence to IB’s claims. The CBI has named Senior IB Official Rajinder Kumar as complicit in the Ishrat Jahan encounter and he is expected to be charged once he retires, sending shockwaves in India’s national security community. Senior IB officials and independent observers believe that Kumar is a “collateral victim” in a vendetta the Congress is carrying out against Modi.

The CBI has gone so far as to ask the IB to reveal who provided it inputs about Ishrat. In asking the IB to reveal its sources, the CBI is breaching a cardinal rule of intelligence gathering and compromising India’s already beleaguered intelligence community. It is an old rule in intelligence and even investigative journalism that sources are not to be revealed, but the CBI is paying scant regard to such principles. Many former directors of IB and RAW believe that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has wrecked the intelligence community beyond repair. He has no power to make any decisions. Sonia Gandhi, Indira’s Italian-born daughter-in-law, is the prime minister’s boss and wields real power but has no interest in national security. Between Manmohan and Sonia nothing gets done and India’s intelligence agencies have become rudderless over the years. Using the CBI to target IB might well be the final nail in a coffin of India’s intelligence agencies. In a country where political interests supersede national interests, institutions, professionals and citizens are paying the price.

Source: Click here

23 Comments

Filed under Congress

23 responses to “The murky world of Congress party

  1. Without Gandhi and Nehru, we would still be under British boots. Give credit where its due.

    • Indian Realist

      It is a myth. Dozen countries in the world got Independence at the same time as India. There were no Gandhi and Nehru there. The real reasons were Britain’s shabby condition after WWII and Subhash Bose’s INA which created an air of mutiny in the Indian army.

      • How naive you can be! For each of those dozen countries there was someone like Gandhi or Nehru leading their freedom movement. And if it was for WW2 why Vietnam, Cambodia, Zimbabwe, Sudan, Libiya, Kenya, Nigeria, Kuwait, Tanzania and scores of other countries didn’t get their independence at the same time?

        • Vineet

          I have been now reading @Cynical’s statements on various blogs and we can clearly see where he stands. Undermine everything and anything connected to Hindus and exalt, defend everything related to Congi/Communist nonsense. No probs, his/her wish.

          How very interesting that a country of our size to be compared with likes of Vietnam, Zimbabwe, Sudan, Libiya, Kuwait, Tanzania etc conveniently forgetting or hiding the major differences – size of the country, overall resources available or strength of British then at that point of time in that continent. Overall strategy of British to let go of what or what to retain.

          Nehru was a gift from Gandhi to this nation, one of many blunders that the committed. Though I admired Gandhi’s passive aggression to a large extent but his blunders are far too big and horrendous to be ignored :

          1. Unnecessarily joining Khilafat movement
          2. Calling off Non-cooperation movement following Chauri-Chaura incident
          3. Muslim appeasement (biggest sin)
          4. Propagating theory of Hindus being cowards and Muslims as natural aggressors (part of muslim appeasement – ignoring riots after riots from Muslim side)
          5. His dealing with Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose
          6. His adamant nature for giving extra to Jinnah
          7. Not allowing for complete interchange of Hindus & Muslims
          8. No calls by way of fasting to Muslims to end riots started by them under direct action and during partition.
          9. and a few more….

          Direct or Indirect rule of Congress for over 55years has dealt heavy blows to this country. The Nehruvian/Sickularist/Socialist policy has caused havoc to national psyche and also rendered the government machinery helpless. Some of the achievements of Congress rule (some would be duplicate as given in the post)

          1. Low growth rate due to Congressi/Socialists policy of government control
          2. Foreign policy disasters
          3. Never ending problems of Kashmir, Assam
          4. Distortion of History to deliberately showcase Hindus in poor light.
          5. Created divisions in Hindu society
          6. Bit by bit, governance structure rendered helpless by its politicization. Remember call of dedicated bureaucracy by Indira Gandhi
          7. Bowing down before Muslims and Christians
          8. Changed the meaning of setting up of Judicial Commission. It now means that the topic is now in cold storage.
          9. No administrative / police reforms
          10. Judicial mess. Why timelines haven’t been defined for even civil cases is beyond me.
          11. State administration should be like iron fist in a velvet glove. Meaning those who abide by the rules will get the velvet touch and those who fight against, state will be firm and hard. Now it is exactly the opposite.
          12. Deliberate attempts to announce doles rather than improving ground level infrastructure.
          13. Many more ..
          14. Final and the most important – institutionalizing THE FAMILY

          Where we are today and where we could have been…

          Regards
          Vineet

          • Anonymous

            One crime of Mohandas that is rarely mentioned – letting Bhagat Singh be hanged. He had enough influence with the Brits to stop it, but he said he’s not interested in saving violent people. How about the followers of the prophet who are actually among the most violent pathological killers in the world ?

        • cnm

          @ cynical,
          The more I read your comments the more I become sure as to the the fact that that you are an incurable anti–Hindu. For your love for that megalomaniac Gandhi read this excerpt from the third volume of great Historian R.C Majumdar’s “History of the Freedom Movement in India”.(page 609-610)
          ” We are now in a position to assert with confidence that the formation of I.N.A was one of the major grounds for the decision of the British Government to quit India. This was admitted by no less a person than Clement Attlee, the head of the British Government which conceived the idea of granting freedom to India and carried out the decision in spite of the opposition of the die-hard Conservatives Churchill. This is proved by the ( English translation of the) following extract of a letter written in Bengli by Shri P.B Chkravarti, ex-Chief Justice of the High Court of Calcutta, on 30.03.76.” When I was acting as Governerof West Bengal(in 1956) Lord Attlee who gave India freedom by putting an end to the British rule, visited India and stayed in the Rajbahvan, Calcutta for two days. I had then a long talk with him about the real grounds for the voluntary withdrawal of the British from India. I put it straight to him like this:

          ” The Quit India Movement of Gandhi practically died out long before 1947 and there was nothing in Indian situation at that time which made it necessary for the British to leave India in a hurry. Why did they then so? In reply Attlee cited several reasons, the most important of which were the activities of Netaji Subhas Chandrad Bose which weakened the very foundation of the attachment of Indian Land land and naval forces to the British Government. Towards the end I asked Lord Attlee about the extent to which the British decision to quit India was influenced by Gandhi’s activities. On hearing this questionAttlee’s lips widened in smile of disdain and he uttered , slowly, putting emphasis on each single letter,- ” mi-ni-mal”.

          Gandhi had committed innumerable blunders during his life time that that greatly harmed the Hindus and are still hurting the Hindus. But the one that harmed HINDUS the most was the one that allowed that thoroughly westernized rudderless, arch anti-Hindu to become the Pm of India.

        • som

          @Cynical,How naive you can be!
          After WWII, Britain left not only India but nearly all its other holdings, including Jordan in 1946, Palestine in 1947, Sri Lanka in 1948, Myanmar in 1948, and Egypt in 1952. For the same reason, France also had to grant independence to Laos in 1949 and Cambodia in 1953, and had to leave Vietnam in 1954. Had there been no Hitler and no World War II, it most probably would have taken another 30 or more years for India and some of the other colonies to achieve independence.
          British historians P.J. Cain and A.G. Hopkins described the hopeless situation of the British in India as follows:

          “By the end of war, there was a loss of purpose at the very center of the imperial system. The gentlemanly administrators who managed the Raj no longer had the heart to devise new moves against increasing odds, not least because after 1939 the majority of the Indian Civil Service were themselves Indian. In 1945 the new Viceroy, Wavell, commented on the “weakness and weariness of the importance of the instrument still our disposal in the shape of the British element in the Indian Civil Service. The town had been lost to opponents of the Raj; the countryside had slipped beyond control. Widespread discontent in the army was followed in 1946 by a mutiny in the navy. It was then Wavell, the unfortunate messenger, reported to London that India had become ungovernable [which finally led to the independence of India]”
          It was British prime minister Clement Atlee who, when granting independence to India, said that Gandhi’s non-violence movement had next to zero effect on the British.

          http://www.susmitkumar.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=100&Itemid=86
          THE REAL CAUSE OF INDIAN INDEPENDENCE… SUBHASH BOSE AND HIS AZAD HIND FAUJ—- Lord Clement Atlee , the British Prime Minister
          http://aryanhindu.blogspot.in/2011/02/real-cause-of-indian-independence.html
          Even without Gandhi, India would have become free. Was there a Gandhi in Burma, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore? Gandhi foolishly injected religion into politics (unnecessarily joining Khilafat movement muslim appeasement – biggest sin-ignoring riots after riots from Muslim side) and this led to the partition of india. If Gandhi had not gatecrashed into Indian politics, Jinnah would not have asked for Pakistan.

      • nitha

        1.11 lakh Indian soldiers died in the First World War for Britain and 2.43 lakh Indian soldiers died in the Second World War for Britain.

        Indians did NOT want to fight for the cruel white English speaking Christian invader.

        See how well Rothschild groomed Gandhi in South Africa using Leo Tolstoy’s mindless non-violence doctrine.

        • ravi

          @nitha,well said

          He is true Mahatma of Rothschilds (The Rothschild family known as the House of Rothschild, or more simply as the Rothschilds, is a European banking dynasty, of German-Jewish origin, that established European banking and finance houses starting in the late 18th century. Five lines of the Austrian branch of the family have been elevated to AUSTRIAN NOBILITY , being given HEREDITARY BARONIES OF THE HABIBURG EMPIRE by Emperor Francis II in 1816. Another line, of the British branch of the family, was elevated to BRITISH NOBILITY at the request of Queen Victoria. During the 1800s, when it was at its height, the family is believed to have possessed by far the LARGEST PRIVATE FORTUNE IN THE WORLD as well as by far the LARGEST FORTUNE IN MODERN WORLD HISTORY. The family’s wealth is was divided amongst hundreds of descendants. Today, they encompass a diverse range of fields, including: mining, banks, energy, mixed farming, wine, and charities. They were real owner of British East India Company ,and they became real rich acquiring tons of gold looted from Malabar temples by Tipu sultan AFTER FALL OF HIS SULTANATE).
          For safeguard the interest of this family he work as a SOLDER recruiting agent for WW I & WW II ,to eliminate every possibility of armed struggle for independence of India (that can cause MUTINY OF BRITISH ARMY),

        • niraj

          Yes,Gandhi’s Ahimsa (non -violence) is not Sanatan Dharma (introduced by Lord Krishna in Bhagwad Gita) ,but a new (extreme ) version of Christianity (introduced by Leo Nikolayevich Tolstoy) .
          Gandhi is not a cult ,bur a new (extreme ) version of Christianity(A MENTOR OF PASSIVE RESISTANCE ),introduced and brainwashed by(a Jew) Leo Tolstoy (e.g “A Letter to Hindoo”)and furnished by (again a jew) Rothschild(banker and actual owner of British East India Company) by gifting 110 acres of lush green land( with fruit trees) in South Africa (Tolstoy Farm) to work as a SOLDER reciting agent for WW II ,to eliminate every possibility of armed struggle for independence of India (that can cause MUTINY OF BRITISH ARMY),an agent (most cunning deployment by Britishers) to safeguard their interest.

        • niraj

          MOPLAH REBALLION OCCURRED DUE TO BETRAYAL OF NATIONALIST LEADERS(ACCORDING TO ALI BROTHERS AND OTHERS) :

          EXCERPTS FROM A PETITION TO LADY READING, THE WIFE OF THE THEN VICEROY OF INDIA FROM RANI OF NILAMBUR:

          “We, the Hindu women of Malabar of varying ranks and stations in life who have recently been overwhelmed by the tremendous catastrophe known as the Moplah rebellion, take the liberty to supplicate your Ladyship for sympathy and succour.
          Your Ladyship is doubtless aware that though our unhappy district has witnessed many Moplah outbreaks in the course of the last 100 years, the present rebellion is unexampled in its magnitude as well as unprecedented in its ferocity. But it is possible that your Ladyship is not fully appraised of all the horrors and atrocities perpetrated by the fiendish rebels -of the many wells and tanks filled up with the mutilated, but often only half dead bodies of our nearest and dearest ones who refused to abandon the faith of our fathers; of pregnant women cut to pieces and left on the roadsides and in the jungles, with the unborn babies protruding from the mangled corpses; of our innocent and helpless children torn from our arms and done to death before our eyes and of our husbands and fathers tortured, flayed and burnt alive; of our helpless sisters forcibly carried away from the midst of kith and kin and subjected to every shame and outrage which the vile and brutal imagination of these inhuman hellhounds could conceive of; of thousands of our homesteads reduced to circular mounds out of sheer savagery in a wanton spirit of destruction; of our places of worship desecrated and destroyed and of the images of the deity shamefully insulted by putting the entrails of slaughtered cows where flower garlands used to lie, or else smashed to pieces; of the wholesale looting of hard earned wealth of generations reducing many who were formerly rich and prosperous to publicly beg for a pie or two in the streets of Calicut, to buy salt or betal leaf -rice being mercifully provided by the various relief agencies.
          The wells full of rotting skeletons, the ruins which once were our dear homes, the heaps of stones which once our place of worship- these are still here to attest to the truth. The cries of our murdered children in their death agonies are still ringing in our ears and will continue to haunt our memory till death brings us peace. We remember how driven out of our native hamlets we wndered starving and naked in the jungles and forests; we remember how we choked and stifled our babies’ cries lest the sound should betray our hiding places to our relentless pursuers. We still vividly realise the moral and spiritual agony that thousands of us passed through when we were forcibly converted into the faith professed by these bloody miscreants; we still have before us the sight of the unendurable and life long misery of those – fortunately few – of our most unhappy sisters who born and brought up in respectable families have been forcibly converted and then married to convict coolies. For five long months not a day has passed with its dread tale horror to unfold.”

          • som

            BTW, the Islamic Khilafat Movement was launched by Indian muslims in September 1919 to PROTECT THE TURKISH KHALIFA AND SAVE THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE FROM DISMEMBERMENT BY BRITAIN AND OTHER EUROPEAN POWERS. The Ali brothers who were more interested in Turkey and Islam than India, initiated the Movement. Its conferences were organized in several cities in northern India.
            The Central Khilafat Committee STARTED A FUND TO HELP THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT FOR GETTING SUPPORT FROM NATIONALIST LEADERS.

            Hardly anybody knows today that Mustafa Kemal, the first Turkish President was a ROTHSHILD( Rothschild is one of the world’s largest independent financial advisory groups, employing approximately 2,800 people in 40 countries around the world.)STOOGE i.e.CHMCHA. Even today Turkey’s army and banks is controlled by Jews Rothschild. This is why ZIONIST (Zionism is a form of nationalism of Jews and Jewish culture that supports a Jewish nation state in territory defined as the Land of Israel Zionism supports Jews upholding their Jewish identity and opposes the assimilation of Jews into other societies and has advocated the return of Jews to Israel as a means for Jews to be liberated from anti-Semitic discrimination, exclusion, and persecution that has occurred in other societies.) BILDERBERG CONFERENCES (The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, or Bilderberg Club is an annual, unofficial, invitation-only conference of approximately 120 to 140 guests from North America and Western Europe, most of whom are people of influence. About one-third are from government and politics, and two-thirds from finance, industry, labour, education and communications. MEETINGS ARE CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC) ARE HELD IN TURKEY and Turkey is member of EU.
            SO, TURKEY WAS NOT IN FAVOR OF KHILAFAT.
            {Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the first crypt o-Muslim president of Turkey, used a Zionist deception ploy to eliminate the Islamic religious practice of wearing of a veil. He could not ban the veil outright, which would incite anger among the people. So he made a law that all prostitutes had to wear the veil.}

            Muhammad Ali jinnah opposed the Khilafat movement. He was concerned about MIXING RELIGION AND POLITICS and he warned Mahatma Gandhi against side effects of his enthusiastic support for the same, to woo the Muslims.
            SO, MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH WAS NOT IN FAVOR OF KHILAFAT.

            So, Gandhi made a mistake.

        • IndianOcean

          The purpose of converting people to Christians worldwide is to fight the Muslims at every part of the world. Again in future Asians, and Africans are going to die large numbers in the name of religion for the sake of Whites to win the world.

          • ravi

            @IndianOcean,
            In future,that( asians, and Africans are going to die large numbers in the name of religion for the sake of Whites to win the world)could be possible if Gandhi(great hypocrite,cheat,violent at heart.brought death to millions, mischievous character with negative ideology,paid and confirmed white men agent who delayed India,s freedom by 40 years,pervert, failed father,lawyer and husband,who justified slaughter of hindus)reborn again.
            Without Gandhi white mens dreams could not be materialized.

        • ravi

          @nitha,well said.
          So,It is a cruel joke and one of the biggest fabrications of the twentieth century that Gandhi(SOLDER recruiting agent for WW I & WW II) won Indian freedom without spilling a drop of blood.

      • niraj

        @Indian Realist,well said.
        The revelations made by the INA trial, and the reaction it produced in India, made it quite plain to the British, already exhausted by the war, that they could no longer depend upon the loyalty of the sepoys for maintaining their authority in India. This had ONE OF THE GREATEST influence upon their final decision to quit India.
        http://books.google.co.in/books?id=P53UqWnGrOgC&pg=PA54&lpg=PA54&dq=The+revelations+made+by+the+INA+trial&source=bl&ots=rTikE2k3V7&sig=Sg5MFXThnSXTq_nuJ1RloJ1GCp4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ZinhUZzqEYzprQewrYDADw&ved=0CFUQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=The%20revelations%20made%20by%20the%20INA%20trial&f=false

    • karan

      Just before the partition, both Hindu and Sikh women were being raped by the Muslims in large numbers. Gandhi advised them that if a Muslim expressed his desire to rape a Hindu or a Sikh lady, she should never refuse him but cooperate with him. She should lie down like a dead with her tongue in between her teeth. Thus the rapist Muslim will be satisfied soon and sooner he leave her. (D Lapierre and L Collins, Freedom at Midnight, Vikas, 1997, p-479).

      Long live the MAHATMA!
      Shall we recommend him for
      Nobel Peace prize?

  2. karan

    “Using the CBI to target IB might well be the final nail in a coffin of India’s intelligence agencies.”
    Well said.Thanks.

  3. To know about Mohandas, who loved sleeping with naked young women, please read articles on Mohandas by Dr. RS Bramhachari.

  4. Vishnu Sharma

    Gandhi’s ideas are an anathema and abomination to the way our Indian mind works and they dent our pride and sense of self-esteem.

    Gandhi and Nehru both forced a very masochistic world view on us and something which a determined enemy can take advantage of easily.

    Pacifism is a deadly sin !
    As deadly as Marxism and Anarchism.

    We want all Indians to jettison these three deadly sins and habits.

    Pacifism will not resolve anything. It will only bring the enemy from your doorstep into your kitchen.

    We want India to be a all powerful entity in the Indian subcontinent, which is an economic powerhouse and an India which is able to retaliate with lightning speed and with mortal consequences to the enemy who thinks he can trifle with our sense of nationhood or our national borders.

    We do not want to revive a dead horse.
    Gandhi and his ideas died with the partition of India and we burned his body as well as his ideas on his funeral pyre in 1948.

    Good Riddance to emasculating philosophers and corrupt leaders who want to appropriate all of India for themselves !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s